Because of its controversial history, original physical copies are often sought after by collectors of "forbidden" or alternative comics.
In a surprising turn, the ruled on April 13, 1984, that the comic did not violate copyright laws. The court decided that because it was a parody , the creators were allowed to use recognizable characters and situations for humorous or satirical purposes. This ruling set a major legal precedent for parodies in the Netherlands. Collector's Information and PDF Searches
Various versions exist, including a 1990 reprint often identified by a "naked Schanulleke" on the cover.
Because of its controversial history, original physical copies are often sought after by collectors of "forbidden" or alternative comics.
In a surprising turn, the ruled on April 13, 1984, that the comic did not violate copyright laws. The court decided that because it was a parody , the creators were allowed to use recognizable characters and situations for humorous or satirical purposes. This ruling set a major legal precedent for parodies in the Netherlands. Collector's Information and PDF Searches
Various versions exist, including a 1990 reprint often identified by a "naked Schanulleke" on the cover.
charliex
joekutz
Tim Wilkinson
jupdyke